Rec Date: September 17, 2018; Acc Date: December 10, 2018; Pub Date: December 14, 2018
Citation: Waqas M, Enam SA, Batool M, Rai HH (2018) Basic Mechanisms of Glioblastoma Multiforme Cell Invasion: A Review Article. J Neurol Neurosci Vol.9 No.6:279. doi: 10.21767/2171-6625.1000279.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary glial neoplasm. GBM can develop both “de novo” or evolve from a previous astrocytoma, being characterized by high proliferation and infiltration into the surrounding tissue. This invasive behavior is the most contributing factor for the poor prognosis of this cancer, despite the multimodal treatment with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Understanding and targeting the molecular mechanisms regulating glioma invasion and progression may help in identifying novel therapeutic targets for GBM treatment. This review will give an overview of some of the signaling pathways that have been shown to positively and negatively regulate GBM invasion, including the Wnt, PI3K/Akt, sonic hedgehog-GLI1 and microRNAs.
GBM; Hedgehog pathway; Wnt pathway; micro RNA
Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive primary glial neoplasm . Because of its high potential for infiltration and invasion, local control of GBM is difficult with either surgery or radiation therapy. Surgical excisions as wide as hemispherectomy have failed to prevent tumor recurrence or improve survival [2,3]. Understanding and targeting of the invasion pathways has therefore, been focus of numerous experiments and pathological studies.
Invasive pathways involve complex interactions among cancer cells, extracellular matrix and white matter. These interactions are regulated by over 140 genes . Multiple regulatory pathways including PI3K/Akt, Wnt, Sonic hedgehog and micro RNAs are implicated in the invasive properties of glioma cells . There is significant genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity within the GBM [6-8]. Different subtypes of GBM such as pro neural (PN), neural, mesenchymal and classic also differ in their different genetic profile [9,10]. Understanding of invasive pathways and their heterogeneity is therefore important for targeting infiltrative potential of GBM. Our understanding of these pathways is, however, still incomplete.
The objective of this article was to review recent literature and provide an update on the basic mechanisms of local invasion of human GBM cells.
Scherer’s structures to the current understanding of invasion
Scherer, a German neuropathologist studied serial sections of the brain from 100 patients and concluded that glioma spreads along structures which he named “secondary structures” in 1938 . These secondary structures, now called Scherer’s structures included brain parenchyma, preexisting blood vessels, white matter tracts and the subarachnoid space . Another important observation that Scherer reported was that the invading cells do not have a single shape or form . Rather, the shape of glioma cells varies according to the pathway they follow - this observation being consistent with the more recent hydrodynamic theory of invasion .
Migration of glioma cells mimics cellular migration during embryogenesis . It starts with morphological polarization and development of membrane protrusions . Glioma cells thus attach with the extracellular matrix (ECM) and pull themselves forward. The interaction of glioma cells with ECM is also chemical [5,13]. Several studies have shown tumor cells to influence stromal cells, altering the composition of the ECM . Migratory cells undergo changes in volume and shape to allow movement through different spaces. The process is regulated by several growth factors, chemokines and cellextracellular matrix interactions. Degradation of the physical barrier of ECM by metalloproteinases (MMP) is essential for the migratory process. MMPs are shown to have a higher expression in glioma cells compared to their normal counterparts . Several other enzymes including plasmin, cathepsin B, cathepsin D and heparanase help glioma cells evade ECM . It has been shown that GBM cells demonstrate both mesenchymal migrations predominantly through Rac1 activation and amoeboid migration through Rho/Rhzo kinase (ROCK) activation [4,15,16].
GBM stem cells and invasive properties
GBM stem cells are a subpopulation of GBM cells that acquire the properties of a stem cell. These stem cell properties are important for their potential to infiltrate, recur and develop resistance to various therapeutic agents . Stem cells in glioma are called glioma stem cells (GSCs) or glioma initiating cells (GICs). GSCs can be identified through their cell surface markers-CD 133 and Nestin . Some GSCs can however, be CD133 negative [17,18]. GSCs capability of producing neurospheres in serum free culture conditions, selfrenewal and multipotency , contribute to their invasiveness of GBM and have attracted interest of scientists and pathologists for decades.
Glutamate promotes invasion
Glutamate acts in an autocrine and paracrine fashion to produces oscillatory Ca++ intracellular changes . These changes are brought through Ca++-permeable AMPA receptors and promote invasion of glioma cells.
Wnt signaling pathway
Wingless/Int1 signaling pathways are involved in embryogenesis, tissue repair and cell self-renewal in adults . Their mutations are implicated in several cancers including colon, breast, leukemias and GBM [20,21]. Wnt ligands Wnt1, Wnt 2, Wnt3a and Wnt5a are overexpressed in gliomas [22-24]. In mice, the knockdown of Wnt1 causes development of non-invasive small glial tumors while the knockdown of Wnt3 completely prevented the tumor formation . And in vitro knockdown of Wnt5, suppresses MMP-2 and GBM invasion .
The three Wnt pathways are canonical Wnt/β-catenin dependent pathway, non-canonical dependent planar cell polarity pathway and the Wnt/Ca++ pathway. Of these three pathways, β-catenin dependent pathway is the most studied cascade [4,5,20].
β–catenin dependent pathway (Figure 1A)  starts when Wnt ligands bind with their seven-transmembrane cell surface receptor, called Frizzled (Fz). On binding Wnt factors, Fz interacts with its co-receptor low-density-lipoprotein-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6), forming a complex that recruits the cytoplasmic scaffolding protein Dishevelled (Ds). The complex translocates to nucleus to interact with T-cell factor (TCF)/ lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) transcription factors to regulate the expression of target genes. These target genes include c-Myc, cyclin D1, and MMPs [21,26]. C-Myc and cyclin D are involved in cellular proliferation while MMPs increase the invasive potential of glioma cells. Wnt factors that are known to activate this β-catenin dependent pathway are Wnt1, Wnt 3a and Wnt 7a . β-catenin is overexpressed in glioma and its knockdown in vitro reduces invasiveness of GBM cells  (Figure 1).
In non-canonical dependent (Figure 1B)  PCP pathway, Wnt signaling at Fz activates a mitogen activated protein kinase called Jun-N-terminal kinase. In Wnt/Ca++ pathway, various Wnt and Fz homologs activate calcium/calmodulindependent kinase II and protein kinase C . These pathways have shown to be upregulated in GBM and are activated by Wnt2, Wnt4, Wnt5a, Wnt5b, Wnt6 and Wnt11 .
β-catenin degradation pathway
In the absence of Wnt signals, β –catenin binds with glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-β) . GSK-3β causes phosphorylation of β-catenin, which is then taken up by proteasome for degradation . Several factors influence this pathway. EGFR trans-activates β-catenin by disrupting its association with α-catenin . FRAT-1 prevents degradation of β-catenin by inhibiting GSK- β, thus upregulating GBM invasion and growth in vivo . While, knockdown of Lef-1, a transcription factor inhibits GBM invasion in vitro .
PI3/Akt signaling pathway
PI3/Akt signaling pathway is implicated in up to 63% of grade III and IV tumors of the brain with an alteration in one of the four genes that form this pathway - epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), PTEN, PIK3R1 and PIK3CA . The activation of PI3K pathway factors is associated with reduced survival , more aggressive behavior and treatment resistance . PI3/Akt/mTOR pathway (Figure 2)  is activated by several growth factors like epithelial growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α). These factors upon binding receptors such as EGFR , gets homodimerized or heterdimerized, resulting in phosphorylation of its intracellular tyrosine kinase domain .
Out of the three classes of PI3K, class I being the most vital to tumorigenesis, consists of a catalytic subunit p110 (α, β, γ) and a regulator subunit p85 [pI3oncotarget]. Upon activation phosphorylated tyrosine of EFGR binds to p85. The subsequent conformation change releases the catalytic subunit p110 . The activated p110 phosphorylates the phosphatidylinositol- 3, 4-bisphosphate (PIP2) into the second messenger phosphatidylinositol-3, 4, 5-bisphosphate (PIP3) . This reaction is reversed by the PI3K antagonist PTEN . Subsequently, PIP3 will recruit the downstream Akt to inner membranes and phosphorylates Akt on its serine/threonine kinase sites (Thr308 and Ser473) [35,36]. Activated Akt phosphorylates several other proteins like GSK3β which stabilizes β-catenin  (Figure 2).
PI3/Akt increases MMP-2 and MMP-3 activity, especially in the peripheral cells enabling them to invade normal brain parenchyma . PTEN on the other hand, suppresses MMP-2 and thus GBM invasion . EGFR and PTEN mutation have been shown to cause continuous activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, thereby contributing to the tumorigenesis .
In PI3/Akt pathway, mTOR is an effector as well as upstream regulator [38,39]. mTOR resides in rapamycin-sensitive mTORcomplex (mTORC1) and a rapamycin-insensitive complex (mTORC2) [40,41]. mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt at Ser-473, taking part in metabolism, survival, proliferation and cytoskeletal reorganization of cells. Activated Akt inhibits tuberous sclerosis complex (TCS1/2), which in turn activates mTORC1. mTORC1 participates in protein translation, ribosomal biogenesis and cell growth [42,43].
Hedgehog pathways are critical to embryogenesis and tumorigenesis. Three types of ligands can activate hedgehog pathway i.e., sonic hedgehog (Shh), Indian hedgehog (ihh), and Desert hedgehog (Dhh) . The receptor is a 12- transmembrane receptor Patched (PTCH). Binding ligand with the receptor abrogates another 7-transmembrane receptor protein called Smoothened (SMO) . This pathway is shown in Figure 3 . SMO prevents degradation of GLI1 which localizes to nucleus and upregulates several genes GLI1, PTCH1, cyclin D, Bcl-2 and VEGF [46,47]. GLI1 is also activated by other pathways like PI3/Akt and MEK. These pathways are activated by receptors tyrosine kinases like EGFR and PDGFR .
GLI family includes GLI1, GLI2, and GLI3 transcription factors. These factors act as effectors of Shh pathway. Another isoform of GLI1 called tGLI1 has been implicated in the invasive properties of GBM and breast cancers [49-52]. tGLI variant has not been detected in normal brain cells but is expressed in most GBM specimens [51,52]. tGLI has also been shown to upregulate the expression of VEGF-A and heparanase . This leads to increased vascularity of GBM compared to the normal GLI variants . Several studies have supported these observations [49-51]. Because of the lack of its expression in malignant cells, GLI can be an excellent target for therapeutic drugs (Figure 3).
The role of microRNAs
MicroRNAs (miRNA) are 20-25 nucleotide long, nonencoding RNA molecules that regulate the expression of more than 2/3rd of genes involved in stem cell related pathways . They play an important role in the tumorigenesis and have been the focus of extensive research over the past decade. miRNAs bind to 3’untranslated regions (3’-UTRS), suppressing the translation of messenger RNA (mRNA) or inducing degradation of mRNA , affecting cell differentiation, proliferation and metabolism. Some of the miRNAs associated with invasion are discussed.
miR-218: miR-218 is significantly downregulated in GBM and correlates negatively with tumor grade [26,53,54]. It acts by downregulating Lef1, which is involved in the upregulation of β-catenin pathway. Lef1 downregulation cases reduction of MMP-2, MMP-7 and MMP-9, which inhibits cell invasion in vitro . miR-218 also downregulates iKKβ mRNA and NF-kB . NF-kB is involved in cellular invasion, increasing MMP-9 . Other targets of miR-218 include GLI1, which is known to increase invasion of tumor cells [51,54,55].
miR-101: miR-101 is a tumor suppressor which is downregulated in GBM [56-58]. It acts on Kruppel-like factor 6 (KLF-6), reducing the expression of chitinase-3 like protein (CH13L1) and inactivating MEK1/2 and PI3 signaling . KLF-6 is involved in cell invasion and migration, which gets inhibited as result of this downregulation.
miR-152: Another miRNA that inhbits invasion, apoptosis and migration of GBM stem cells (GMCs) and is downregulated in GBM . Its acts by targeting Kruppel-like factor (KLF4) which downregulates galectin-3 (LGALS3) and inactivates MEK ½ an dPI3K signaling pathways .
miR-491: miR-491 is shown to inhibit the expression of protein kinase B (p-AKT1), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), Cyclin D1 and MMP-2. This leads to arrest of GSCs in G0/G1 phase, reduced proliferative activity and invasive potential. This pathway is a target for new therapeutic agents .
miR-125b: miR-125 is an oncogene, commonly overexpressed in GSCs. Its suppression can decrease proliferative activity and invasive potential of GSCs . It is also involved in the development of drug resistance to temozolamide (TMZ) . An inhibition of the miR-125b on the other hand sensitizes GSCs to TMZ, downregulating MMP-2, MMP-9 through PIAS3 (which inhibits STAT signaling) in vivo and in vitro .
miR-181c: Overexpression of miR-181c inhibited GSC T98G migration and invasion [65,66]. The expression of E-cadherin was significantly upregulated, while N-cadherin and vimentin was significantly down-regulated by miR-181c . miR-181c overexpression also inhibits TGF-β signaling by downregulating TGFBR1, TGFBR2 and TGFBRAP1 expression . miR-181c thus plays a key role in GBM invasion, migration and mesenchymal transition [65,66].
GBM is an aggressive tumor with heterogeneous molecular features and complex host interactions involving the interplay of several pathways, many of which are amenable to therapeutic intervention.
All Published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright © 2019 All rights reserved. iMedPub LTD Last revised : January 20, 2019